Forward by Fredric L. Rice:
What follows is part 1 of a transcript of a voice telephone
conversation which took place between three individuals, one
of which -- Tom Padgett -- is a victim of Scientology's Fair
Game policy. The Scientology crime syndicate engaged in
racketeering activities to try to silnce Mr. Padgett whose
wife is being controlled completely by the cult to the point
where lying under oath is common.
Among the many video taped court proceedings one may find on
XenuTV.NET is a video of the
cult's lawyers trying to keep the fact that Padgett's ex-wife is a
Scientologist from making it into the court record, trying to claim
it's not relevant. In fact it's entirely relevant since it's the
crime syndicate pulling the cultist's strings to try to silence
Mr. Padgett.
You'll note that two of the individuals in the following transcript
exhibit hatred and verge upon the insane while Mr. Padgett remains
calm and reasonable throughout. That speaks volumes about who is
credible and who's not.
Click [HERE] for an MP3 audio copy of
the original telephone conversation. (NOTE: Audio file has been
put on hold since it's still not clear whether all parts of the
audio have been agreed to by all parties for being tape recorded.)
boobootigger@webtv.net (Tigger)
Diane Richardson and Keith Spurgeon collaborated on this
Scientologically similar DA webpage.
Padgett Call: Feb. 21, 2003t
http://fleagle.topcities.com/nada.htm
Changed:10:02 AM on Wednesday, July 9, 2003
I have listened to an audio tape recording of a March 9, 2003 phone
call in which Diane Richardson, Keith Spurgeon and Tom Padgett were
the participants. Why do Keith and Diane refuse to web this phone
call?
Spaces_______which appear in this transcript of that phone call are
due to my inability to decipher some of the interruptions of Diane and
Keith. Corrections of any errors would be appreciated.
I am solely responsible (it was my idea) for posting this to a.r.s. (So
Diane, honey, if you want to rant and rave about your and Keith's true
natures and lack of proof being exposed, pick the right target)
Tigger
Part 1 of 2 parts:
Diane Richardson: No...Ah....I don't see any reason for that......I'm
just going to tell you exactly the same thing I told you on the
newsgroup. I'm not really sure why you think it's so strange that I
would say to you to your face what I have written on
alt.religion.scientology.
Tom Padgett: Just a wild theory....
Diane: Well, It's a very wild
Tom: go ahead....set it up.
Diane: theory, because you know, I've told it all to you on the
newsgroup. I think you're dishonest.....I think you're lying.....I think
you're doing it.....because it's a way of turning your scummy behavior
with your family into some sort of a....noble dead when all you've been
doing is....you know, ignoring your children except when you use them as
ah, weapons against your ex wife. And I don't think anybody who does
that deserves any sort of respect, let alone, admiration. Ah...I don't
know....I can keep on going on if you want me to.
Tom: Sure, go ahead.
Diane: I'm....(laugh) I, ah.......You've lied.....you've lied about me
and you've lied to me. Ah, you don't keep agreements....you slither
outof things. Ah, you're a weasel. Ah, let me think of what else I can
tell you (laugh)....I could go on and on with this, I guess. I, ah.....I
think you've been very dishonest...dishonest, not only with the people
on the newsgroup....ah, but I think you've been dishonest with your
family members and ah.......I think you've probably spent a good part of
your life lying.........and, ah, refusing to take responsibility for
your own behavior.....an, and about this time in your life, you've
turned into, what I consider, a professional victim. Ah, you do it
unthinkingly. Ah, you're so used to lying that ah.....it's just turned
into a way of life for you. So, that's it. I don't know what else I can
tell you.
Tom: O.K. And I am speaking to Diane Richardson?
Diane: Yes, you are.
Tom: O.K. Are you done with your seven minutes?
Diane: Yes.
Tom: Diane, do you have any proof or evidence that Laura Vannoy is not
a Scientologist or no longer a member of that sect?
Diane: The proof that I have see......that I have is your inability to
provide proof that she is.
Tom: O.K....So I will take that as a"No".
Do you have any proof or
Diane: No, it's not a no. Let me
Tom: No, you have to let me finish. I didn't interrupt you..
Diane: It's not a no.
Tom: You're interrupting me.
Diane: Well, if you are going to ask me questions, you have to give
me...
Tom: Diane,
Diane: give me an opportunity ...
Tom: you're interrupting me.
Diane: to answer them.
Tom: O.K. Do you have any proof or evidence that the belief system of
Scientology or Dianetics is not involved or a relevant factor in the
litigation against me in Kentucky?
Diane: Once again, are you going to limit me to a yes or no, or may I
give a full explanation of my opinion?
Tom: As long as it (chuckle) doesn't take up the seven minutes, go
ahead.
Diane: Be my guest. Ah, the evidence that I have that Scientology is
not involved in your litigation is your inability to provide any proof
to the court or to alt.religion. scientology that the Church of
Scientology has been, in any way, involved in your child support
litigation.
Tom: O.K. But, other than that, you have no proof?
Diane: The proof I have is your inability to provide proo, proof for
the claims you have made.
Tom: O.K. Do you have any proof or evidence that on November 16, 1998,
I owed any amount of money for the support of my children....a dime...a
nickel...or any dollar amount?
Diane: Why do you pick 1998?
Tom: Because you stated that's when I pled guilty.
Diane: That's when you pled guilty......Ah, you pled guilty to flagrant
non support.
Tom: That's a statute. Do you have any proof..
Diane: No, that's not a statute...That was a charge that was filed
against you.
Tom: Diane, I'm asking you, I'm asking you... do you have any proof or
evidence
Diane: Yes, I do.
Tom: that I owed money for support of my children on November 16, 1998,
or ever since then?
Diane: That's the date you pled guilty to flagrant non support ...
that's a felony.
Tom: O.K. So you have no proof or evidence that I owe money
Diane: No, I have
Tom: you're stating
Diane: I have..
Tom: that I pled guilty. That's true.
Diane: That's true because that's
Tom: That's true. O.K.
Diane: what flagrant non support means, Tom.
Tom: O.K. Do you consider yourself a
caring, considerate and compassionate person, Diane Richardson?
Diane: I consider myself caring and compassionate and considerate to the
people who deserve such.....ah, ah, such attention. You do not.
Tom: That's good. That's, I think...that's a good answer.
Diane: I think so too.
Tom: Am I
Diane: Ah, liars, dishonest liars,
Tom: I didn't interrupt you, I didn't interrupt your time.
Diane: O.K.
Tom: Am I correct in stating that you have never met me in person?
Diane: I have never met you in person....no.
Tom: O.K. Am I correct in stating that you have never met any members of
my family?
Diane: I have never met any members of your family.
Tom: Am I correct in stating that you have never met any of the expert,
material(?) eye witnesses in the Kentucky litigation?
Diane: ah.....You are incorrect in that.
Tom: O.K. So you have met witnesses in the Kentucky litigation?
Diane: Well, it depends on.....someone who signed an affidavit for you.
Tom: Oh, O.K. =A0 Ah, am I correct in stating that you are not a parent
and have...... don't have any children?
Diane: I don't see how that has any applicability to my
Tom: O.K., but am I correct in stating that?
Diane: I have no children.
Tom: O. K.
Diane: I have numerous
Tom: Am I correct
Diane: =A0 nieces and nephews however.
Tom: Am I correct in assuming that you are not a psychologist, medical
doctor, sociologist, lawyer or clergy member of any religion
Diane: You're not either.
Tom: as your profession?
Diane: =A0 You're not either, Tom (snicker)
Tom: That's correct. That's correct. So
Diane: __________wouldn't I? (laugh)
Tom: I'm assuming I'm correct that none of those are your professions?
Diane: What?
Tom: I'm correct in assuming..THEY're not mine..........but am I correct
in assuming that none of those are your profession?......a psychologist,
medical doctor sociologist, lawyer or clergy?
Diane: As I said, neither you nor I are any of the above.
Tom: O.K. Do you consider yourself a fact finder and seeker of truth
regardless of prejudice or bias?
Diane: I guess I do. (laugh)
Tom: O.K. Now, the last thing I have to say is my mailing address is
Post Office Box 414, South Orleans, Mass. 02662. Now, if you have any
proof or evidence of anything that you want to
Daine: (laughing)
Tom: share with me or you want to send with me or anything that you have
not provided for your claims on the internet,
Diane: (laughing)
Tom: I would be delighted to look at it.
Diane: We'll
Tom: O.K.?
Diane: We'll keep it on the newsgroup. (laugh) We'll keep it out there
where there is, where there are actual witnesses who can see your lying,
your dishonesty, your cheating.....that's all, that's the only reason I
even bother with scum like you. Ah, I just want to make sure the rest of
the world knows what a horrible piece of scum you are.
Tom: Well, thank you very much.
Diane: You're quite welcome. Any time at all.
Tom: O.K.
Diane: Anytime. Let me ma......let me repeat this again. Anytime at all
that you want me or Keith to tell you what we think of you, just give us
a ring and we'll be glad to go through it all over again.
Tom: Well, thank you.....that's a dandy offer.
Diane: Anytime....Anytime you're down in N. Y. City, let us know because
we will do the same thing right to your face, TommyBoy. (laugh)
Tom: O.K. And it's the same thing I repeat to you, if you come up with
any proof or evidence of your claims against me, I would be
Diane: ____________ (laugh)
Tom: I would be delighted to receive them.
Diane: You are the one who has made the claims. You were the one who has
been unabe to support your claims
Tom: I didn't make the claims of the names you just called me.
Diane: Those are conclusions that I have drawn
Tom: Oh, those are conclusions?
Diane: because of your inability to prove your claims.
Tom: O.K.
Diane: Get that straight. You're the one making the claims. You are
the person who (e.......) you have been given every chance in the world
to make.......to provide evidence to support your claims.
Tom: You're talking abut......You're talking about a.r.s. right? You're
not talking about the real world. You are talking about a.r.s.
Daine: Tom, the only place I care to know you is on a.r.s.
Tom: O.K.......that's good.
Diane: Ah, you know....you'd never... I would never even think of giving
you the time of day.
Tom: Actually, that's really good because that's what I wanted to know.
Diane: Great.
Tom: is that your life exists on a.r.s.
Diane: My life certainly does not exist on a.r.s.
Tom: Thnak you. Thank you very much for confirming that.
Diane: Hey, Tom. Hey, Tom....tell me this. Uh.....................how
much time do you spend at work every day?
Tom: How much time do I spend at work every day?
Diane: Yeah.
Tom: Currently, I am not working, Diane.
Diane: (gleefully) Hey, (laugh) isn't that something? I kind of think
that alt. religion. scientology and OCMB and whatever have a whole lot
greater place in your life than they do in mine. =A0 Because, whether
you like to admit it or not, (laughing) I hold a full time job. I
am....I, uh, I am a member of a faculty of a very highly regartded
medical school. I deign to think about you maybe ten or twenty mniutes
out of a day and it sure does appear to be that you spend a whole lot
more time than that thinking about me and
Tom: ABOUT YOU?
Diane: Keith Spurgeon and everyone else. It's obvious from what you
post. It's obvious. Um, you know, and when I have a few minutes at the
end of the day or in the morning before I go to work, I will look at
what you have to say and decide whether it's........it's grossly
dishonest enough for me to bother deigning it with a reply.
Tom: And I.....I do pretty much the same thing, and for your informaton,
because I
Diane: You're unemployed.
Tom: say I am not working, that I'm not working
Diane: Yeah, You're unemployed, yeah.
What DIANE RICHARDSON & KEITH SPURGEON Don't Want You to Hear
9 Jul 2003
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
March 9, 2003
The name "Scientology"® is trademarked to the "Church" of Scientology. Neither this web page, nor this web site, nor any of the individuals mentioned herein assisting to educate the public about the Scientology organization's Fair Game policy are members of or representitives of the Scientology organization.
Trademark usage on the Fair Gamed web site
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank